Thursday, July 1, 2010

Let's see what Ald. Rugai does

From Chicago Breaking News:

Mayor Richard Daley unveiled a gun control ordinance today that would require gun owners to register their weapons with the city, get training and keep all but one firearm locked up.

But the mayor scaled back an earlier idea of only allowing one gun per adult in a home, instead going with a provision that would limit registration with the city to one handgun a month.

The proposals will go before the City Council Police and Fire Committee today, and Daley said the full council will meet Friday to consider it.


Alderman Rugai is on the Police and Fire Committee. Our take on the new law is an attempt by government to regulate what you do in your own home to protect yourself. Limiting 1 gun in the home as being operational? Please. All of the other guns would need to be broken down or trigger locked. Listen, if you feel the need to have more than 1 gun in your home functioning, feel free to have it. It is YOUR home. Not Mayor Daley's, Alderman Rugai's or anyone elses. It is YOUR home. You pay enough money to live in this neighborhood with 1 beat car to protect you, you should have the right to protect yourself anyway you feel you need to.

There are a lot of other provisions in the proposed ordinance that make absolutely no sense. For instance, the banning of assault weapons. What is an assault weapon? Fuck, a baseball bat is an assault weapon. Don't let people scare you with words that describe a gun. Even so called 'assault weapons' require someone to pull a trigger just like a handgun.

The proposed ordinance also says that you cannot take the weapon out of your home and be on YOUR property with it. Really? We cannot take something that is ours, that we have a right to have and bring it onto something else that is ours (our land) and that we have a right to have. What a warped way of thinking.

We feel that any legislation that restricts a right is fundamentally flawed. Our alderman should respect our views and vote with her constituents on this bill. A vote against this bill in committee from her would be her honoring her constituents views. Remember, these restrictions only affect the law abiding citizens in the community. The criminal element never gave a damn and still won't.

Or she could just not show up to the committee meeting like she did when the original 'Fred Hampton Way' sign snuck its way through the committee.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

time to vote Rugai AND Daley
O-U-T...

Anonymous said...

What part of the right to keep and bear Arms, and that right not to be infringed upon, don't these Kooky Crookago Demo-commies understand? Once again, people will sue, and the Shitty will again waste all our tax dollars trying to defend yet another unconstitutional ordinance, which nobody will probably obey anyway, criminals certainly won't , and we the taxpayerws will be stuck paying the bill, and the corrupt Daley Administration will pocket all they can illegally, as usual...

Anonymous said...

who the hell is "we"? All your posts are in the plural. You got a mouse in your pocket?

Anonymous said...

da chicago way will never trump the US CONSTITUTION!

Anonymous said...

who the hell is "we"? All your posts are in the plural. You got a mouse in your pocket?

************

Question is too stupid for an intelligent answer.

However, "We think YOU are stupid."

Also the mouse, is on the desk not pocket (sarcasm)

Anonymous said...

Where are Chicago's patriotic millionaires??

Anonymous said...

I love how these liberal democrats are all about the power of "choice," especially in the CHOICE to abort/murder an unborn baby (which they stop at nothing to protect), but when you want to exercise the CHOICE to protect yourself with a firearm that is actually WRITTEN in the constitution, unlike ABORTION, well then its time to take a hard look at things. Expect Rugai to follow in the footsteps of other cardboard "Catholic" blow hards like Kerry, Kennedy, Pelosi and Daley and stand against the supreme court ruling

Anonymous said...

JULY 1 ,4:O4 P.M.>SEMPER FI!

Anonymous said...

so 2211 did it again this time they got a guy on lawndale. great job guys on 3rd watch. july 1 another white kid with dope keep it up 2211 is on the hunt

Anonymous said...

TIME TO LAUNCH ALL THESE CLOWN DEMOCRATS IN THE NEXT ELECTIONS.

Anonymous said...

She will do as she is told, as she has always done. Just another Shortshank's Daley
puppet. It's reallty time for her to go and get a real job instead of a lifetime spent suckig at the public teat.

Anonymous said...

rugai sucks...that's all that needs to be said

Linda said...

Yes she has to go!

Anonymous said...

Daley has personally appointed 32 or 34 of our current Aldermen in this city. They were NOT elected the first time around, and of course, it has always been much easier to get re-elected as an incumbent, than it has to just run for an office and get elected. So if King Richard has between 64 & 68% of YES votes in the bag from the city council right from the start, it’s pretty likely that anything he wants passed, will pass.

And they vote for Daley’s new un-constitutional gun regulations and requirements passed 45-0 yesterday, so if Rugai was present and not one of the five ‘no shows’……she voted with Daley and his band of criminals.

Thanks to Eddie Burke, part of these new requirements force gun offenders to register “kinda like a sex offender” if they get convicted of a gun violation.

Everyone can do what they want to do, but for me, I’m not registering anything.

Considering the fact that the Supreme Court has already ruled twice that criminals cannot be prosecuted for failure to register a firearm without violating their rights to self incrimination just by answering the questions on the gun registration application, why should the law abiding?

Gun registration is always pre-text to confiscation, and they’ll never know where to look if you don’t tell them what you got. If you volunteer any information to the government, expect to have your door kicked down sooner or later……..and it’ll be nobodies fault but your own!

AMENDMENT II
“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

I don’t see any reference to types of arms, registration, regulations or any other requirements here…..DO YOU?

What do you think "to keep and bear Arms" means? To me, it means just what it says. And keep and bear Arms I will, just as I always have, and never killed anyone.

I'll do what's right for me, and you can do what's right for you!

Anonymous said...

TIME FOR ORGANIZING A PICKET OF RUGAI'S OFFICE. ANYONE INTEREST, PLEASE POST. MG PROTECTION, WE NEED YOUR HELP. WE ARE BEING FLEECED DAILY BY THIS ALDER-CURR AND HER CHRONIES AT CITY HALL, AND GET LITTLE IN RETURN COMPARED TO NUMEROUS OTHER CITY NEIGHBORHOODS.

Anonymous said...

5to4 vote that is amazing,screw the libs!

Anonymous said...

SHE WONT DO SHIT BELEIVE ME,